![]() |
|---|
|
We absolutely need to fit into the system and play according to the rules in the country which we reside. This is separate from (1) our heritage, (2) our value system, and (3) our identity. There is no two views, if you know there are two systems, and you know which system you are talking about. This is nothing about which system is better. The talking about two views is oversimplified and biased, and underestimate the readers' intellegence, but I suppose it serve to rouse readers' interest. Back || Post a follow-up message || Manager only
Do you hold an Asian or American view regarding politics?
Take 4 easy quizzes.
1) What a presidential election is about:
Asian View: To vote for the best candidate according to national
interest, although what national interest is could vary widely
according to individuals.
Am. View: To maximize one's own self interest or
enlightened self
interest.
2) Standard for judging if Affirmative Action (AA) is good/bad?
Asian View: The standard is whether AA serves the national interest,
although what national interest is may vary widely from "need to
correct historic wrongs" to "meritocracy is supreme."
Am View: what is best for one's own self interest or
enlightened self
interest.
Digression
Question: If the above representation of the American view
regarding politics is correct, how could the US survive if most
Americans are for their self interest, enlightened or otherwise?
Answer: America applies the principle of market economy to politics.
That is, let every individual/group/community maximize his/her/its own
interest. The struggle between different interests will create the
"checks and balances" which shall serve as the "invisible hand" guiding
the conflicting interests towards the the best interest of the nation.
Question: Is there evidence that American politics is centered upon
"self interest comes first"?
Evidence: When obsolete military bases are to be closed to eliminate
waste, every senator/congressman will state: "Obsolete military bases
should be closed, but not the ones in my state/district, because they are
still serving vital functions." Why? Because in American politics, one is
expected to take care of self-interest first.
Question: Any evidence that educated Americans hold the same belief?
Evidence: President John Adams said, "It is not true, in fact, that any
people ever existed who love the public better than themselves."
President
John F. Kennedy referring to the heroes in his book "Profiles in Courage"
wrote, "not because they 'loved the public better than themselves.'
(but) because they did love themselves -- because each one's need to
maintain his own respect for himself was more important to him than (a
list of other needs)."
3) View towards a political action committee e.g. 80-20 PAC:
Asian View: 80-20 seems politically effective in fighting for the rightful
concerns of the Asian
Amercian community, but 80-20's
approach to politics is so
different from the politics practiced in Asia.
Am. View: How can a small minority of recent immigrants like the Asian
Am community not have at least one organization like 80-20?
How else is the smallest immigrant minority to defend its rights
in the rough and tumble world of politics?
4) Attitude towards High Officials:
Asian View: High officials are like parents to whom we should respect &
devote. Many Asians subconsciously expect high officials to whom
they've donated generously to "take care" of them when they are
in real need. They expect the officials (acting as parents) to come
to their aid (suffering as children in need). Is such an expectation
realistic? Not in America!
Am View: Officials, high or low in ranking, are public servants
who are subject to reward or punishment by American citizens
who are the bosses. They expect law to be
applied equally.
Concluson: While being proud of our Asian heritage, when it come to politics,
do as Americans do.
For feedback, visit
http://www.80-20educationalfoundation.org/politicaledu/posterboard.asp
Warmest regards,
S.B. Woo
President, 80-20 Educational Foundation, Inc.